Froth turns to… not froth
While still kinda new to the carry scene, Lexdray has found fast favour amongst the online blog community. Lots of tech and details, some great shapes, and some really slick branding make for some pretty catchy blog candy.
So when our friends at Huckberry offered us a Boulder pack, we started to froth a little. With a shape inspired by the super photogenic Visvim 20L pack, the Boulder takes a big EDC brush to this silhouette, adding a tonne of pockets and parts. The pack arrives in a nice fleece lined bag, and almost all the parts and components are a pretty high spec (hence the slightly scary price tag of $460 – but man, do you feel a million bucks walking around with it on your back).
So how did it fair in a week long Drive By? Hmmm, not great. Read on and we’ll explain.
-
Highlights
Overall Look
Yep, it’s sexy, in a bit of a grown up boyscout way. A great silhouette is kept a touch on the small side (perfect size for office life), adding to it’s visual tightness. If you pull out the waist band and the top grab handle cover, it really slims it right down. Lot’s of texture changes keep the black thing interesting, and many of those pockets are hidden inside so as not to distract overly from the shape.
-
The whole kitchen sink
It’s rare that you get a pack with very few cost compromises. The Boulder has a rain cover, a trillion million pockets, expensive zips and components, expensive fabrics, and a lot of options for almost any small bits you need to carry. Heck, even the bag it comes in is fully lined in a deluxe fleece (which we flipped inside out to use as a pillow for office naps). It’s built well, and looks like it will last well.
-
A few small touches
While nothing new, neoprene gussets can help fit that last little bit into your pack by stretching to help you get the zip closed. Not many makers use them on backpacks, but we like.
There’s also a keeper for the sternum strap when not in use, some elastic side webbing for wrapping a sweater or jacket around the pack, and a very nice laptop section (max 15″ laptop fit). The size and padding on the straps makes for a comfortable ride, even when full.
-
Lowlights
OK, here’s where we start to shatter some of the fantasy. We REALLY wanted to love this pack, but there are some fundamental flaws that mean it needs another generation of refinement before it will get there.
The simplest way to explain the issue is to quote the late great Steve Jobs:
“When you start looking at a problem and it seems really simple, you don’t really understand the complexity of the problem. Then you get into the problem, and you see that it’s really complicated, and you come up with all these convoluted solutions. That’s sort of the middle, and that’s where most people stop….
But the really great person will keep on going and find the key, the underlying principle of the problem—and come up with an elegant, really beautiful solution that works. That’s what we wanted to do with Mac.” Steve Jobs, from Insanely Great.
Yep, the Lexdray stopped in that middle complicated bit. But let us get more specific…
-
Zippers
Grid zips work great on wetsuits. They look tough and are tough. But the second you ask them to go around corners, or get pulled on a less than perfect angle, they get notchy and catch. When you add some locking zip heads to the equation, this gets even worse. For most of the zippers on the Boulder, you really have to concentrate to use them. So while they look great, some of them can drive you crazy – the back panel in particular…
-
Weight
When you add every feature to a bag, weight becomes a factor. We measured almost 5lbs on our dodgy travel scales, which might be a touch too much for a small daypack. Pardon the poorly put-together pun, but that sort of weight can weigh on you.
-
Pockets
There’s a lot of pockets in this pack, and most of them are neoprene. Neoprene can work well for shock protection and stretch, but these are mostly internal pockets that are already protected from shock, and they are then often mounted low in a section, which is a squash point for packs, so you’d never put anything delicate down there anyways. Hmmm, for us (even though we’re neoprene wearing surf freaks) it was a bit of neo OD.
The press button closures are mounted on webbing which stops the stretch, and the pocket covers often have non-stretch nylon backing. So you get the extra weight and bulk, without much of the expansion benefit. They are also grouped into many different zones, which makes it tricky to work out what you put where.
-
Some niggles
The lash tab is a fake hypalon, so can’t hold a lash without tearing. There’s a few areas of the TPE fabric already showing wear, there’s airmesh (which scratches on bare skin), the waist belt is OTT for the pack’s non-load bearing fixed height design, and the whole back panel section and twin zip access is really hard to operate.
The neoprene cover for the top of this back section also has a nylon backing which stops any stretch ability, but will smell lots as the neo’s nylon fronting jersey absorbs your back sweat. Then if you fill the pockets in this rear section, you can’t close it, and either way there’s some unusable dead zones created by the internal pocketing. The rain cover section zip is on a high wear area, and it’s a bit odd making a lovely top handle to then hide it under a removable neoprene wrap.
[Addition: Justin pointed out that the sternum strap is not height adjustable for females or different height users (females often have to raise a sternum strap up above their boobs). That's a pretty big issue for anyone not a male between 5'9" and 6'0" or so]
-
Similar bags to consider
If you’re digging the look, you can check out the Visvim 20L (more expensive and probably not as high quality) or KILLSPENCER Special Ops (cleaner aesthetic but not as much organizing). If you’re digging the organizability (new word, we’re keeping it) check out the Arc’teryx Blade 24 or the very full-on Acronym 3A-7TS. If you like versatility and ability to blend, check out the Goruck GR1 (and maybe add a couple of internal modules to it).
-
Overall
This is a great looking pack that everyone in the office wanted to try out. It’s a neat size if you’re an office guy or want something a touch smaller, it’s well put together, and the materials are (mostly) of a high standard.
Sorry Lexdray, we really wanted to like this pack, but we almost all retreated back to other bags after just a few days. If you carry lots of small things, it should provide you with all those pockets you’ve always wanted. But for us at least, we are looking forward to the next generation with some of those issues refined out.
Oh, and a big thanks to Huckberry for providing the pack. You should check them out, as they offer some of the best carry brands around.
Latest posts by ando (see all)
- Hacks :: Kid-Proof Drug Bags - May 14, 2013
- Head to Head :: Adventure Duffels - May 8, 2013
- A Love Affair | My Gregory Kletter Day - May 6, 2013








































Good stuff. The review is great and very helpful, but even after everything you guys said about it I somehow still really want this backpack lol.
Haha, yeah, we hear you. It’s a sexy looking bag, so lots of crew will be willing to live with a few issues. Heck, as we like to quote Picasso, “it’s the mistakes that make it interesting.”
Great review guys!
I was looking to purchase this pack but this review has definitely made me rethink, as for that money you want something as perfect as possible (although it still looks awesome)! May go with a Goruck instead……. Or another Visvim as already the proud owner of a Visvim Ballistic K 28L, but they are sooooo expensive!
Also, any chance you guys are going to review Ipad bags at some point? It took me ages to find one that was perfect for me (I eventually went with the BagJack Circ-disc cover) and I was really surprised at the poor level of choice out there! Also, any thoughts on the Acronym messenger bags?
Keep up the awesome work, I love this site!
Send us some photos and thoughts on your Visvim, we’d be down to hear/see what you think.
Cheers, will do over the next week or so!
We’ve had a couple of looks at iPad sleeves:
http://www.carryology.com/2010/05/26/how-will-you-carry-your-ipad/
http://www.carryology.com/2010/10/20/ipad-sleeves/
Although we could probably refresh those posts soon, as Hard Graft and a few others have updated offerings.
Re: Acronym, we’re pretty sure it’s the Bagjack team working alongside Acronym for their bags, so for sure they’re solid, they’re just also pretty complex. One of our contributors has just started testing the Bagjack NXL messenger (http://www.bagjackshop.com/en/messenger-nxl-m/), so maybe hold back and check that review (he’s loving it so far).
It is indeed Bagjack that they are working with…. I have a one of the Baicyclon Bagjack Messengers and wasnt sure whether Acronym were worth the price difference.
I saw the NXL Messenger the other day on their website! Will definitely check out the review.
Cheers for the response, it is greatly appreciated and will look at the Ipad stuff.
Thanks Again,
Neil
You know me, with the interest in military-style packs, I’ve been reaching out to Acronym for some time now. I’d love to test out one of their messengers or backpacks and share my experience.
Lexdray Boulder Pack is such a nice series of back packs, tough looks, durable material and they are even really good in quality.
a bit lame that the sternum strap isn’t adjustable, any issues with this during your test?
The sternum strap IS adjustable. In the pic, that’s it clicked into the keeper for it. It’s a standard sternum strap, so works fine. The harness length is not adjustable (to cater for different height users), but most small daypacks aren’t. It’s just always a bit odd to have such elaborate waist belts on non-adjustable height packs.
Does that make sense?
The sternum strap height not adjustable (to cater for different height users) -why even include one then. Imagine how useless this pack is for women especially, sternum strap digging into a boob is never comfortable.
Ahhh, gosh, my bad. I see what you mean. Yep, I must be kinda standard height, as I didn’t even notice the lack of height adjustment. But yeah, that’s a pretty major omission, as short or tall crew will def notice an issue there. Good pick up.
i have been eying these packs for a while, so im glad you guys were able to steer me away before making a costly mistake. but then i also looked at a review you guys did on lexdray’s tokyo pack and it had a far less negative review. would you recommend the tokyo pack over the boulder pack or should i just steer clear all together? thanks
Ummm, I think there’s a couple of things to it:
1) Sygyzy (who reviewed the Tokyo) is probably less of an OCD than I am, so some of those niggles wouldn’t have rubbed him the way they did me.
2) The Tokyo probably has a couple fewer niggles.
If it was me, I’d wait until Mark 2 on these bags. There is some neat underlying stuff in them, they just need a bit of refinement. If you’re dropping north of $4 hundgie on a backpack, you want it to last, so waiting a little longer should be worth it.
Pingback: Road Test :: TAD FAST Pack Litespeed Backpack | Carryology
Are u going to review the boulder pack 2.0???
We’ll try to, but it will depend how we go getting one…
cant wait to see the review on mark 2…
been eyeing this bag for awhile was almost gonna buy it at turnablelab…
hopefully the black edition of mark 2 come out soon cause my patient isnt gonna hold much longer.
turntablelab*